Curves_back
Monday, May 12, 2008
| Search For Venues | Search:
Topics

show top ten
show top 100
Topics
venue logo
meeting planners
venue owners
Subscribe
Subscribe free of charge to receive a daily e-mail with the headline news from TravelDailyNews International. Just type your e-mail and click the check-marked button.

Member of :



Association of Canadian Travel Agencies
ACTA deplores improvement fee increase at Montreal-Trudeau Airport
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Aeroports de Montreal (ADM) announced that it would increase its improvement fee to $20 for passengers departing from Montreal-Trudeau Airport. Introduced as a temporary measure in 1997, the tax was meant to upgrade the country’s second busiest airport.

Not only has the tax become permanent, but it has also been raised to the same level as the one for Toronto-Pearson, whose 10-year $4.5-billion redevelopment program started in 1996, even though Montreal-Trudeau says it has spent $1.1 billion since 2000 on its modernization and expansion program as the Association of Canadian Travel Agencies stated.

When the Government of Canada announced its new airport rent policy in May 2006, with a 10-year plan in which a 50% rent reduction was envisaged for Montreal, it published the following statement:

“The government expects airport authorities to pass on savings through fee reductions. Already, the majority of Canada’s major airport authorities have committed to ensuring that a significant portion of the rent savings will be passed on to air carriers and passengers through adjustments to fees. The government will propose legislation that will enhance Canadian airport authorities’ transparency and accountability measures.”

“ACTA can only conclude that if there were any savings, they have certainly not been passed on to passengers, and that the government has done nothing to enhance transparency since Bill C-20 died on the order paper,” commented Christiane Theberge, President and CEO of ACTA.

Moreover, this improvement tax is in addition to many other taxes, fees and surcharges that are ultimately passed on to travellers, such as the Security Charge, which was introduced in April 2002 and whose $434-million surplus is not even used to improve airport security. It is estimated that such fees and surcharges represent 30% to 40% of the final airline bill the consumer pays.

“This situation is unacceptable, and the Canadian government must act to significantly reduce the unsustainable burden of almost $1billion of government fees and surcharges that are imposed on the air travel sector and ultimately passed down to the travel consumer,” Ms. Theberge concluded.
Theodore Koumelis - Thursday, October 11, 2007
0 recommendation(s) , 59 print(s), 605 views, 0 comment(s)
Recommend Print Comment

Bookmark with:

Delicious Delicious Digg Digg Reddit reddit Facebook Facebook Stumbleupon StumbleUpon
Related_articles
Red_dot
ACTA welcomed the new TMR advertising policy, but... Baloon
Theodore Koumelis - Thursday, March 27, 2008
Red_dot
ACTA Manitoba and Nunavut’s Regional Council has a new Chair
Michael Verikios - Friday, March 21, 2008
Red_dot
ACTA welcomes 2008 Atlas Awards nominations
Michael Verikios - Thursday, February 14, 2008
Red_dot
Carnival moves on retroactive fuel surcharge
Theodore Koumelis - Monday, December 03, 2007
Red_dot
ASTA and ACTA applauds RCCL`s stance against card mills
Theodore Koumelis - Friday, October 12, 2007
Red_dot
ACTA`s forum brings closer wholesalers and travel agents
Theodore Koumelis - Thursday, October 04, 2007
Red_dot
ACTA awards travel agents in Canada
Theodore Koumelis - Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Featured_events
Article_by_ittfa
Exhibitions_calendar
Poll
How is the use of biofuels by the aviation industry going to affect the environment?

It will be a positive step towards fighting climate change, as the aviation industry will be able to reduce its C02 emissions.

It will be positive for the environment but it will cause huge problems in other industries such as the food industry, especially in food supply.

It will have a negative impact as the widespread planting and use of biofuel crops could threaten the natural ecosystems.

It will harm the environment as carbon savings from biofuels are negligible.

Stats All Polls