Curves_back
Saturday, July 04, 2009
Online store
Join Our Newsletter | Search For Venues | Search:
Topics
show top ten
show top 100
Topics
Follow Us On

Facebook

Linkedin

Twitter

venue logo
meeting planners
venue owners
Subscribe
Subscribe free of charge to receive a daily e-mail with the headline news from TravelDailyNews International. Just click the check-marked button.
Subscribe

Member of :



Cheapflights defends the consumer right to take flight
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
As a UN study on the level of CO2 emissions caused by shipping hits the headlines, Cheapflights.co.uk speaks out. The leaked UN study calculates that the shipping industry is responsible for 1.12bn tonnes of CO2 emissions, which accounts for 4.5 per cent of all global emissions. By comparison, emissions caused by aviation amount to just over 650m tonnes, which is a significantly lower figure.

Cheapflights.co.uk, the price flight comparison website, re-affirms the environmental dangers caused by shipping while delivering the facts on aviation and fervently defending the consumer's right to enjoy travel.

In a reasoned reaction on the subject, Cheapflights’ CEO David Soskin says, “It’s about time people woke up to the environmental dangers of shipping. We at Cheapflights have been raising awareness on the subject for years, but environmental lobbyists have kept the focus on airlines, using them as an easy target instead of heeding our warnings on other culprits.”

Mr. Soskin further defends aviation in highlighting its great strides towards the introduction of environmentally friendly aircraft such as the Boeing Dreamliner and Airbus 380, both of which use 20% less fuel. Additional industry-wide measures are also underway addressing greenhouse gas emissions by aircraft, including a recent flight trial between British Airways and Shell using less polluting aviation fuels.

In a keynote speech delivered to the World Travel CEO Forum in October of 2007, Soskin cited that carbon dioxide emissions caused by shipping are double those of aviation. He also explained that the industry is responsible for 90 per cent of world trade, which has doubled in the last 25 years and is increasing at a rate that will have a serious impact on global warming.

“The failure of the green lobby to highlight these dangers and also tackle the countries whose emissions contribute the majority of greenhouse gases world-wide is part of a wilful and misplaced propaganda exercise designed only to demonise air travel. Their heavy guns are pointing in the wrong direction: they are guilty of the sin of omission and should now confess the error of their ways and direct their considerable lobbying powers at the real culprits,” he adds.

“Travel is a wonderful and valuable activity that brings pleasure to many and importantly huge economic benefits to developing countries as well as to the UK,” concludes Soskin.

Vicky Karantzavelou - Wednesday, February 20, 2008
0 recommendation(s) , 108 print(s), 644 views, 0 comment(s)
Recommend Print Comment
Bookmark this page: Bookmark
Related_articles
Red_dot
Recessionistas go cintinental to stretch pounds
Tatiana Rokou - Thursday, May 21, 2009
Red_dot
Cheapflights.co.uk unveils the British public's ultimate plane
Vicky Karantzavelou - Friday, May 08, 2009
Red_dot
Beyond the Eurozone
Vicky Karantzavelou - Monday, April 13, 2009
Red_dot
Cheapflights.co.uk launches unique new affiliate programme
Tatiana Rokou - Friday, January 23, 2009
Red_dot
Cheapflights.co.uk defends budget airlines
Vicky Karantzavelou - Friday, February 01, 2008
Red_dot
Brits consider their partner the most essential travel item
Theodore Koumelis - Thursday, November 08, 2007
Red_dot
Survey reveals the worst in-flight etiquette offences
Vicky Karantzavelou - Thursday, May 24, 2007
Presentation
Research
Special_features
Article
Morpheus_in_pursuit_of_luxury
Poll
The imminent privatization of Olympic Airlines is expected to change the fate of this debt-laden airline. What do you think the new owner should do in regard to the brand name of the Greek national flag carrier?.

Keep “Olympic Airlines” as the name of the company as it remains a strong brand.

The company should keep “Olympic” as an element of its name but refresh the brand (e.g. “New Olympic Airlines”).

The airline should drop “Olympic” from its name. This brand has lost its value and isn’t relevant to the market anymore.

Stats All Polls