Curves_back
Sunday, July 05, 2009
Online store
Join Our Newsletter | Search For Venues | Search:
Topics
show top ten
show top 100
Topics
Follow Us On

Facebook

Linkedin

Twitter

venue logo
meeting planners
venue owners
Subscribe
Subscribe free of charge to receive a daily e-mail with the headline news from TravelDailyNews International. Just click the check-marked button.
Subscribe

Member of :



Association of Corporate Travel Executives
ACTE calls for a Moratorium on Border Crossing Information system
Thursday, August 28, 2008
On Monday, 25 August, The Association of Corporate Travel Executives (ACTE) advocated a moratorium on the new Border Crossing Information (BCI) system. The association’s call for a delay in implementation was in response to a recent notice that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has begun tracking border crossing information of foreign visitors, and would store that data for 75 years. The data retention period for U.S. citizens is 15 years.

"With the current world average for life expectancy at 66 years, the information retention period by the DHS of foreign travelers would exceed most people's natural lifetimes," said Susan Gurley, the association's Executive Director. "And while ACTE openly supports any program that will guarantee the security and intergrity of U.S. borders, there is additional concern that the DHS Border Crossing Information System may compromise the privacy of national and foreign travelers without any appreciable increase in security."

ACTE’s primary objections relate to the amount of time the data would be stored, how the data would be protected, and moreover that the data would be shared with third parties. Both the 15-year and the 75-year parameters set by the DHS seem arbitrary. In commentary submitted today, Gurley said, “The BCI 15-year data retention policy for U.S. citizens appears not to be justifiable in furthering law enforcement purposes. And, unless the typical foreign visitor was an infant when entering the United States, travel files would be kept active years after the subject would, in all probability, be deceased.”

Of equal concern to the association is that data gathered by the BCI system would be made available to undefined law enforcement agencies. Published reports state the data may even be accessed in court cases and for employment hiring purposes. ACTE’s concern is that DHS has not provided a rationale as to why travelers’ information, absent of any reported unlawful activity, should be shared with potential employers.

ACTE’s leadership has again noted that the DHS has made minimal effort to explain how data generated by the Border Crossing Information system would be stored or destroyed after the 15- and 75-year time retention periods have elapsed.

"With ACTE having so many international members, we want to ensure that DHS has reasonable and justifiable travel data retention timelines for both U.S. and foreign visitors," concluded Gurley.

Theodore Koumelis - Thursday, August 28, 2008
0 recommendation(s) , 138 print(s), 847 views, 0 comment(s)
Recommend Print Comment
Bookmark this page: Bookmark
Related_articles
Red_dot
Ravel & Hospitality super networking event, Singapore
Theodore Koumelis - Friday, May 22, 2009
Red_dot
Fear of public perception raises business travel and meeting expenses
Vicky Karantzavelou - Thursday, April 02, 2009
Red_dot
ACTE continues alliance with Georgetown University
Tatiana Rokou - Friday, January 23, 2009
Red_dot
Upwardly mobile: The next step for travel management
Tatiana Rokou - Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Red_dot
ACTE and BA to offset carbon emissions for Rome Global Education Conference
Vicky Karantzavelou - Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Red_dot
ACTE honors four members for service and commitment
Tatiana Rokou - Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Interview
Special_features
Article
Poll
The imminent privatization of Olympic Airlines is expected to change the fate of this debt-laden airline. What do you think the new owner should do in regard to the brand name of the Greek national flag carrier?.

Keep “Olympic Airlines” as the name of the company as it remains a strong brand.

The company should keep “Olympic” as an element of its name but refresh the brand (e.g. “New Olympic Airlines”).

The airline should drop “Olympic” from its name. This brand has lost its value and isn’t relevant to the market anymore.

Stats All Polls