Curves_back
Saturday, July 04, 2009
Online store
Join Our Newsletter | Search For Venues | Search:
Topics
show top ten
show top 100
Topics
Follow Us On

Facebook

Linkedin

Twitter

venue logo
meeting planners
venue owners
Subscribe
Subscribe free of charge to receive a daily e-mail with the headline news from TravelDailyNews International. Just click the check-marked button.
Subscribe

Member of :



Association of Corporate Travel Executives
ACTE calls for industry support on new laptop seizure bill
Tuesday, September 30, 2008
The Association of Corporate Travel Executives (ACTE) has endorsed a new bill that guarantees travelers rights in cases of laptop seizure at U.S. borders. The “Travelers’ Privacy Protection Act of 2008” (Senate bill S. 3612 and House bill H.R. 7118), introduced by U.S. Senator Russ Feingold (Wisconsin), cosponsored by U.S. Senator Maria Cantwell (Washington), U.S. Senator Daniel Akaka (Hawaii), and U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (Oregon), was introduced on September 26, 2008. According to ACTE Executive Director Susan Gurley, this bill requires U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials to demonstrate reasonable suspicion - and to obtain a warrant - before seizing a laptop or other electronic device and randomly copying the data it contains.

“This bill introduces a much higher, and necessary, level of accountability to the laptop examination process,” said Gurley. “It requires the authorities to seek a warrant, which makes it subject to judicial process. It puts an end to the indiscriminate ransacking of data. It allows the traveler to witness the process, and it limits the time officials can hold a traveler’s hardware. It even provides compensation for damage to a traveler’s computer.”

The warrant strictly defines the material that can be copied, stored, and shared with other government agencies. It also sets a brief timeline in which laptops and other devices must be returned to their owners. Finally, it requires all government agencies to keep any confiscated data in a secure facility, with limited access, and to be immediately destroyed beyond recall if further action is not forthcoming.

“These are all key points that ACTE has been fighting for since 2006 and recommended in testimony before Congress in June 2008,” said Gurley. ACTE first introduced the laptop seizure issue to the traveling public two years ago, and has been the business travel industry’s leading advocate for transparency and change in this system.

The language of the bill emphatically reiterates ACTE’s position of the unique nature of laptops and other electronic devices. It explains that unlike other “closed containers” that cross the border, laptops can contain full libraries of information about a person, including medical records, financial disclosures, emails, privileged work products, and journals. All of this material may be subject to invasive examination by search engines that are indiscriminate in their discovery.

The bill states, “Electronic search tools render searches of electronic equipment more invasive than searches of physical locations or objects. Requiring citizens and other legal residents of the United States to submit to a government review and analysis of thousands of pages of their most personal information without any suspicion of wrongdoing is incompatible with the values of liberty and personal freedom on which the United States was founded.”

The Travelers' Privacy Protection Act of 2008 will also dramatically change the procedure used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection authorities in examining laptops and other electronic devices. Inspectors will have to state the suspicion, secure the approval of a superior, and examine the contents of the laptop in a confidential surrounding - in the presence of the superior and the laptop’s owner.

Border officials will have three days to secure a warrant, or 21 days to secure a ruling from a Foreign Intelligence Court. Suspicious data may be used in the application. However, failure to receive a warrant or a ruling within the specified period of time will require any data to be destroyed, and the device returned to the owner.

Gurley added that the entire business travel industry should support this bill as a beginning to the end of indiscriminate security procedures. “This bill is a good beginning,” said Gurley. “And it will be perfect when these protections are extended to all travelers, not just U.S. citizens.”

Theodore Koumelis - Tuesday, September 30, 2008
0 recommendation(s) , 193 print(s), 1146 views, 0 comment(s)
Recommend Print Comment
Bookmark this page: Bookmark
Related_articles
Red_dot
Ravel & Hospitality super networking event, Singapore
Theodore Koumelis - Friday, May 22, 2009
Red_dot
Fear of public perception raises business travel and meeting expenses
Vicky Karantzavelou - Thursday, April 02, 2009
Red_dot
ACTE continues alliance with Georgetown University
Tatiana Rokou - Friday, January 23, 2009
Red_dot
Upwardly mobile: The next step for travel management
Tatiana Rokou - Wednesday, November 26, 2008
Red_dot
ACTE and BA to offset carbon emissions for Rome Global Education Conference
Vicky Karantzavelou - Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Red_dot
ACTE honors four members for service and commitment
Tatiana Rokou - Tuesday, October 07, 2008
Interview
Special_features
Article
Poll
The imminent privatization of Olympic Airlines is expected to change the fate of this debt-laden airline. What do you think the new owner should do in regard to the brand name of the Greek national flag carrier?.

Keep “Olympic Airlines” as the name of the company as it remains a strong brand.

The company should keep “Olympic” as an element of its name but refresh the brand (e.g. “New Olympic Airlines”).

The airline should drop “Olympic” from its name. This brand has lost its value and isn’t relevant to the market anymore.

Stats All Polls