
Cost Control and Beyond, a new report published by CFO Europe Research Services in collaboration with Amadeus, the leading global technology and distribution partner for the travel and tourism industry, has found that less than 40% of CFOs are satisfied with the levels of savings delivered by corporate travel programmes in their company.
The study is a result of research with CFOs in Europe, the US and Asia Pacific in a variety of industry sectors and investigates their perspectives on corporate travel management - an area which, to date, has not been widely explored. It found that while CFOs clearly view travel through a cost-control lens, travel cost management has so far made a minimal contribution to companies’ overall cost control programmes.
CFOs believe that corporate travel managers should better balance travel service quality with cost cutting, driving direct cost savings through improved supplier negotiations and a tighter view of travel spend across the company. CFOs also want their travel teams to focus on enhanced employee productivity and integrated corporate IT systems.
Key findings are particularly pertinent against the current backdrop of economic uncertainty, with companies scrambling to cut costs without compromising on standards:1. More fact-based advice on improved profitability
2. Tighter cost control by being able to track travel spend by project or individual
3. The ability to create better budgets and forecasts
The report also found that over 50% of CFOs are still not wholly convinced of the business benefits of ‘green’ travel.
Commenting on the report Frank Palapies, Head of Global Commercial Operations, Amadeus said: “Amadeus’ objective in commissioning this report has been to discover how finance and travel management departments can work together more effectively and what role technology can play in supporting this. It seems there is still a discrepancy between maintaining corporate travel service quality while striving to keep costs down, but technology can help by providing the tools to increase the transparency, efficiency and control of travel programmes.”
Just 27% of respondents considered the relationship between corporate travel service departments and CFOs to be very effective, although CFOs make the ultimate decisions on travel budget and travel technology investments. The report however can be used as a practical guide for corporate travel managers to “speak the language” of those working in finance departments and present smart business cases for travel programme investment with the right mix of cost, standard and value arguments.