Sunday, February 12, 2012
Curves_back
Any grant of immunity should be limited to protect competition
Travel agents file comments to antitrust immunity for Oneworld Alliance
Friday, January 15, 2010

ASTA and the Interactive Travel Services Association (ITSA) filed supplemental comments in response to oneworld Alliance’s (American Airlines, British Airways, Finnair, Iberia Airlines, Royal Jordanian Airlines) application for anti-trust immunity (ATI) to the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). In its comments, the two groups requested that “given [the] risk of significant competitive harm, any grant of immunity to the oneworld applicants should be limited to protect competition” and “that the Department carve out from any ATI grant any form of cooperation by the Joint Applicants in their dealings with independent travel distributors.”
 
ASTA and ITSA said that any granting of ATI that extends to dealings with travel distributors such as travel agents is likely to cause consumers significant harm “first, by ultimately reducing travel distributors’ bargaining power and marginalizing independent distribution through commission reductions and withholding inventory, and second by increasing fares paid by consumers as the number and effectiveness of independent travel distributors are reduced and consumers’ ability to find and compare competing airline service offerings becomes increasingly limited.”
 
The comments went on to note that whereas consumers and travel agents want lower fares and increased service, ATI and alliance status are not “factors in consumer choice - lower fares and more frequencies on nonstop flights matter the most.” Nor is ATI necessary to provide efficient coordination between carriers, the two groups explain. In fact, “the Joint Applicants utterly fail to show how efficiency requires immunized joint dealing with travel agents... the Joint Applicants do not make it clear that immunizing joint dealing with travel agents would benefit anyone other than the Joint Applicants.”
 
Consumers, as already noted, will also come out on the losing end should this ATI be granted for a variety of reasons, not the least which being that any resulting reduction in the “number and effectiveness of travel agents would also increase fare for consumers by reducing their ability to find and compare competing airlines service offerings.”

Tatiana Rokou - Friday, January 15, 2010
0 recommendation(s) , 120 print(s), 1475 views, 0 comment(s)
Recommend Print Comment
Bookmark this page: Bookmark
Related_articles
Red_dot
ASTA says Obama plans will help travel play key economic role
Vicky Karantzavelou - Monday, January 23, 2012
Red_dot
Web 2.0 plays increasing role in agency marketing
Tatiana Rokou - Wednesday, January 04, 2012
Red_dot
ASTA agencies forecast moderate staffing growth for 2012
Theodore Koumelis - Thursday, November 10, 2011
Red_dot
Vacation.com member crowned ASTA’s Travel Agent of the Year
Vicky Karantzavelou - Tuesday, October 04, 2011
Red_dot
ASTA’s THETRAVELBLOGGERSHOW gets rave reviews
Tatiana Rokou - Monday, September 26, 2011
Red_dot
ASTA Board elects Executive Committee
Theodore Koumelis - Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Red_dot
Los Angeles hotel occupancy tax lawsuit is wrong claims ITSA
Theodore Koumelis - Monday, January 10, 2005